Cryptocom Sues SEC, Asserting Overreach in Crypto Regulation
Cryptocurrency exchange Crypto.com has taken a bold step by filing a lawsuit against the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), joining other crypto firms in contesting what it perceives as the agency’s overreach in regulating the industry.
The company argues that the SEC is acting beyond its legal authority and threatening the future of cryptocurrency in the United States.
Response to SEC’s Wells Notice
The lawsuit follows a Wells notice issued to Crypto.com by the SEC, indicating that the agency’s staff recommends enforcement action against the company.
In response, Crypto.com described the SEC’s actions as part of a broader strategy of “regulation by enforcement,” which it claims is both unauthorized and detrimental to the industry. In fact, the firm believes these enforcement actions contradict bipartisan signals that suggest future U.S. administrations may pursue more constructive approaches to cryptocurrency regulation.
“This is an unprecedented move for our company,” Crypto.com stated, emphasizing the seriousness of the situation.
The company maintains that it had no choice but to pursue legal action to safeguard the industry’s interests.
Allegations of SEC Overreach
At the heart of Crypto.com’s lawsuit is the claim that the SEC has unlawfully expanded its jurisdiction over the cryptocurrency industry. The exchange contends that the SEC has classified nearly all cryptocurrency transactions as securities transactions, while exempting Bitcoin (BTC) and Ethereum (ETH) from similar designations.
Crypto.com argues that this “unlawful rule” was never subjected to the legally required notice and comment period, a crucial procedural step mandated by the Administrative Procedure Act. The company also asserts that the SEC’s actions are arbitrary, especially given the similarities between the crypto assets and Bitcoin and Ethereum.
Insights from Experts
Justin Wales, Head of Legal for The Americas at Crypto.com, emphasized the stakes involved in the lawsuit.
“Crypto.com just filed a lawsuit against the SEC, asserting that the agency lacks the authority from Congress to regulate secondary market sales of crypto and challenging its ongoing practice of using enforcement actions to unlawfully expand its oversight of the crypto industry,” he stated.
Wales further argued that the SEC’s well-documented de facto rule that all crypto assets, other than Bitcoin and Ethereum, are to be regulated as securities violates federal law. “Regulation by enforcement is still regulation, and the SEC cannot sue its way into powers Congress has not granted it,” he added.
In addition to the lawsuit, Crypto.com has also petitioned the SEC and CFTC under provisions of Dodd-Frank, seeking confirmation that digital assets are not securities subject to the SEC’s oversight.
Petition for Clarity on Crypto Derivatives
In addition to the lawsuit, Crypto.com’s affiliate, Crypto.com | Derivatives North America (CDNA), has submitted a petition to both the SEC and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). This petition seeks a joint interpretation confirming that certain cryptocurrency derivatives fall solely under CFTC regulation, thereby avoiding conflicting regulatory oversight.
Filed under the Dodd-Frank Act, the petition allows market participants to seek clarity on whether specific products are categorized as “swaps,” “security-based swaps,” or “mixed swaps.” The agencies must respond within 120 days, either by providing a joint interpretation or explaining why such an interpretation was denied.
Aiming to Check SEC Overreach
Crypto.com has expressed confidence in its legal position, citing recent court rulings that have favored the cryptocurrency industry in disputes with the SEC. The company believes that the U.S. Judicial Branch will play a vital role in checking what it characterizes as the SEC’s arbitrary actions against the crypto sector.
Despite the ongoing legal battle, Crypto.com assures its users that it remains committed to maintaining regular operations.
