Regulation & Policy
Share
The aftermath of this year's banking crisis continues as the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision explores the possibility of banks disclosing their crypto asset holdings. Operating under the Bank for International Settlements, this committee pinpointed crypto asset holdings as a contributing factor to the downfall of several banks earlier this year.
During its October 4–5 meeting, the committee delved into the reasons behind the failures of banks like Silicon Valley Bank, Signature Bank of New York, and First Republic Bank, along with the near-collapse of Credit Suisse, which was subsequently acquired by UBS. The committee's report identifies three structural trends that may have indirectly played a role in these failures: the increasing prominence of nonbank intermediaries, the concentration of crypto assets in a few banks, and the accelerated movement of customer funds due to growing digitalization.
The report specifically underscores the impact of crypto on Signature Bank's demise, noting that the bank's significant concentration of digital asset clients left it vulnerable when the "crypto winter" hit in 2022. Poor governance and inadequate risk management practices hindered the bank's ability to manage liquidity during times of stress. Signature Bank was subsequently closed by the New York State Department of Financial Services on March 12, although regulators stated that crypto was not the primary reason for their decision.
Disclaimer of Warranty
The information provided in this article is for general informational purposes only. We make no warranties about the completeness, reliability, and accuracy of this information. Read full disclaimer
It's important to note that this discussion does not necessarily imply planned revisions to the Basel Framework. In January, the committee had already amended its framework to limit the inclusion of crypto assets in bank reserves to 2%. The report indicates that a consultation paper on disclosing crypto asset exposure will be published soon.
This discussion serves as the latest review of the challenges banks faced in March. In April, the United States Federal Reserve Bank and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) released their findings on the events, with the FDIC revisiting the matter in August.




Editor's Picks

UAE Stablecoins: Why They Are Built to Travel, Not Stay Local
Walid Abou Zaki
Feb 28, 2026
8 min

The Central Bank of the UAE Clearing the Noise Around Article 62
Walid Abou Zaki
Feb 25, 2026
5 min

Europe’s Crypto Purge: Did Lithuania Just Kick Out Innovation — and is the UAE the Beneficiary?
Salma Naueihed
Feb 18, 2026
7 min
Read More Articles
In the Same Space

US Federal Court Dismisses All Claims Against Binance in Anti-Terrorism Lawsuit
News Desk
Mar 9, 2026
3 min

SEC Seeks Settlement With Justin Sun in TRON Case
News Desk
Mar 6, 2026
4 min

VARA Issues Alert Against MEXC Over Unlicensed Activity
News Desk
Mar 6, 2026
2 min

Iran Linked to $3B in Crypto Activity as Illicit Flows Increase
News Desk
Mar 6, 2026
4 min